Electoral MeridianIndependent Election Research

Forecasts. Results. Evidence.

Arizona · 2026 election coverage

Yavapai County

2026 election results and ballot analysis across 68 contests in the county's official results file. Explore local offices, propositions and the communities within Yavapai County.

90% counted

An estimate, from the county's progress in the governor's race. How Arizona's count runs.

Official county results. These are the contests in the county's results file, not an address-specific sample ballot. Eligibility varies by district and precinct.

Results file posted Nov 5, 2:28 PM. Source checked Nov 5, 5:29 PM.

Covered contests
68
Propositions with yes/no returns
27
Incorporated cities & towns
11

Observed returns, unofficial until certified. “Ahead” describes the current count; it is not a local race call. Candidate selections in multi-seat contests are not ballots. Precinct reporting does not establish how many ballots remain.

Reading the county count

The governor's race

119,902 valid candidate selections are reported for governor in this county observation. Andy Kerr, Sine Biggs ahead by 26,153 votes (21.8 points).

This is a county portion of a statewide contest. A county lead is not a statewide election outcome.

Where the count is close

CANON E.S.D. #50 SCHOOL GOVERNING BOARD (4- YEAR TERM): 7 votes between the current last seat position and the next candidate.

The smallest verifiable seat-boundary gap among covered candidate contests with a known seat count. A gap is withheld if unassigned write-ins could change its ranking. District races show this county's portion.

Among the 27 covered propositions with yes/no choices, Yes is ahead in 20 and No in 6. Ties and unreported counts remain unresolved. These are observed leads, not declarations that a measure passed or failed.

Ballot & results

All named candidates and reported write-in groups are retained. Shares use valid candidate selections for that contest, excluding overvotes and undervotes. A multi-seat share is not the percentage of voters supporting a candidate.

Federal & state

ATTORNEY GENERAL

ATTORNEY GENERAL: reported votes and shares
CandidateVotesShare
Warren Petersen R72,90861.9%
Kris Mayes D44,82538.0%
Write-in820.1%

117,815 valid selections.

Warren Petersen ahead by 28,083 votes (23.8 points).

Statewide forecast: Mayes >99%. This is the county's share of a bigger contest.

CORPORATION COMMISSIONER vote for 2

CORPORATION COMMISSIONER: reported votes and shares
CandidateVotesShare
Kevin Thompson R70,31032.3%
Ralph Heap R65,90130.3%
Clara Pratte D39,72018.3%
Jonathon Hill D38,37317.7%
Mike Cease G2,9431.4%
Write-in1070.0%

217,354 valid selections.

26,181 votes between the current last seat position and the next candidate.

Statewide forecast: Pratte >99%, Hill 98%. This is the county's share of a bigger contest.

GOVERNOR AND LIEUTENANT GOVERNOR

GOVERNOR AND LIEUTENANT GOVERNOR: reported votes and shares
CandidateVotesShare
Andy Kerr, Sine Biggs R71,89460.0%
Katie Giles, John Hobbs D45,74138.1%
Teri Ann Harrolle Mohan, Angela Hourihan N1,2751.1%
Risa Castillo, Lisa Lombardo G9280.8%
Write-in640.1%
Alice Novoa00.0%
Gertritrude Gonzalez00.0%

119,902 valid selections.

Andy Kerr, Sine Biggs ahead by 26,153 votes (21.8 points).

Called statewide: Hobbs. This is the county's share of a bigger contest.

SECRETARY OF STATE

SECRETARY OF STATE: reported votes and shares
CandidateVotesShare
Alexander Kolodin R72,46861.4%
Adrian Fontes D43,84937.1%
Duwayne Collier G1,7111.4%
Write-in570.0%

118,085 valid selections.

Alexander Kolodin ahead by 28,619 votes (24.2 points).

Statewide forecast: Fontes >99%. This is the county's share of a bigger contest.

STATE MINE INSPECTOR

STATE MINE INSPECTOR: reported votes and shares
CandidateVotesShare
Walter "les" Presmyk R74,95464.8%
Brian Matlock D40,69935.2%
Write-in940.1%

115,747 valid selections.

Walter "les" Presmyk ahead by 34,255 votes (29.6 points).

Statewide forecast: Matlock 97%. This is the county's share of a bigger contest.

STATE REP - DIST. 1 vote for 2

STATE REP - DIST. 1: reported votes and shares
CandidateVotesShare
Selina Bliss R68,46938.9%
Quang Huu Nguyen R65,29737.1%
Sandy Zalecki D41,71723.7%
Write-in3820.2%
Charles "charlie" Eakins710.0%

175,936 valid selections.

23,580 votes between the current last seat position and the next candidate.

Statewide forecast: Bliss >99%, Nguyen >99%. This is the county's share of a bigger contest.

STATE REP - DIST. 30 vote for 2

STATE REP - DIST. 30: reported votes and shares
CandidateVotesShare
Mike Gannuscio R1,04444.2%
David Rose R94540.0%
Brian Mcmahan D37115.7%
Write-in00.0%

2,360 valid selections.

574 votes between the current last seat position and the next candidate.

Statewide forecast: Gannuscio >99%, Rose >99%. This is the county's share of a bigger contest.

STATE SENATOR - DIST. 1

STATE SENATOR - DIST. 1: reported votes and shares
CandidateVotesShare
Mark Finchem R72,91662.3%
Christine Ellen Dargon D44,00437.6%
Write-in1250.1%

117,045 valid selections.

Mark Finchem ahead by 28,912 votes (24.7 points).

Statewide forecast: Finchem >99%. This is the county's share of a bigger contest.

STATE SENATOR - DIST. 30

STATE SENATOR - DIST. 30: reported votes and shares
CandidateVotesShare
Leo Biasiucci R1,18498.9%
Write-in131.1%

1,197 valid selections.

Reported candidate selections; no local race call or seat outcome is inferred.

Statewide forecast: Biasiucci >99%. This is the county's share of a bigger contest.

STATE TREASURER

STATE TREASURER: reported votes and shares
CandidateVotesShare
Elijah Norton R74,70564.0%
Nick Mansour D41,90035.9%
Write-in990.1%

116,704 valid selections.

Elijah Norton ahead by 32,805 votes (28.1 points).

Statewide forecast: Mansour >99%. This is the county's share of a bigger contest.

SUPERINTENDENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION

SUPERINTENDENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION: reported votes and shares
CandidateVotesShare
Kimberly Yee R75,13964.2%
Teresa Leyba Ruiz D41,81035.7%
Write-in1000.1%
Stephen Jr. Neal80.0%
Gerard Davis50.0%

117,062 valid selections.

Kimberly Yee ahead by 33,329 votes (28.5 points).

Statewide forecast: Ruiz 98%. This is the county's share of a bigger contest.

U.S. REP IN CONGRESS - DIST. 2

U.S. REP IN CONGRESS - DIST. 2: reported votes and shares
CandidateVotesShare
Eli Crane R73,89661.7%
Jonathan Nez D43,72636.5%
Curtis Goodwin L2,0101.7%
Write-in550.0%

119,687 valid selections.

Eli Crane ahead by 30,170 votes (25.2 points).

Statewide forecast: Crane 94%. This is the county's share of a bigger contest.

Propositions

PROPOSITION 141

PROPOSITION 141: reported votes and shares
ChoiceVotesShare
Yes70,43761.0%
No44,94539.0%

115,382 valid selections.

Yes ahead by 25,492 votes (22.1 points).

Statewide forecast: Yes 83%. This is the county's share of a bigger contest.

PROPOSITION 142

PROPOSITION 142: reported votes and shares
ChoiceVotesShare
No59,26651.5%
Yes55,76548.5%

115,031 valid selections.

No ahead by 3,501 votes (3.0 points).

Statewide forecast: No >99%. This is the county's share of a bigger contest.

PROPOSITION 144

PROPOSITION 144: reported votes and shares
ChoiceVotesShare
Yes69,42659.9%
No46,47340.1%

115,899 valid selections.

Yes ahead by 22,953 votes (19.8 points).

Statewide forecast: No >99%. This is the county's share of a bigger contest.

PROPOSITION 316

PROPOSITION 316: reported votes and shares
ChoiceVotesShare
Yes81,23270.5%
No33,93629.5%

115,168 valid selections.

Yes ahead by 47,296 votes (41.1 points).

Statewide forecast: Yes >99%. This is the county's share of a bigger contest.

PROPOSITION 317

PROPOSITION 317: reported votes and shares
ChoiceVotesShare
Yes80,50169.8%
No34,79230.2%

115,293 valid selections.

Yes ahead by 45,709 votes (39.6 points).

Statewide forecast: Yes >99%. This is the county's share of a bigger contest.

PROPOSITION 318

PROPOSITION 318: reported votes and shares
ChoiceVotesShare
Yes83,63172.3%
No32,06927.7%

115,700 valid selections.

Yes ahead by 51,562 votes (44.6 points).

Statewide forecast: Yes >99%. This is the county's share of a bigger contest.

PROPOSITION 319

PROPOSITION 319: reported votes and shares
ChoiceVotesShare
Yes73,53164.0%
No41,37236.0%

114,903 valid selections.

Yes ahead by 32,159 votes (28.0 points).

Statewide forecast: Yes >99%. This is the county's share of a bigger contest.

PROPOSITION 320

PROPOSITION 320: reported votes and shares
ChoiceVotesShare
Yes65,10557.4%
No48,22442.6%

113,329 valid selections.

Yes ahead by 16,881 votes (14.9 points).

Statewide forecast: No 93%. This is the county's share of a bigger contest.

PROPOSITION 401

PROPOSITION 401: reported votes and shares
ChoiceVotesShare
Yes14,03558.5%
No9,96341.5%

23,998 valid selections.

Yes ahead by 4,072 votes (17.0 points).

Estimate: Yes >99% chance. It only asks whether the votes left could close the gap.

PROPOSITION 402

PROPOSITION 402: reported votes and shares
ChoiceVotesShare
Yes12,84854.0%
No10,95346.0%

23,801 valid selections.

Yes ahead by 1,895 votes (8.0 points).

Estimate: Yes >99% chance. It only asks whether the votes left could close the gap.

PROPOSITION 404

PROPOSITION 404: reported votes and shares
ChoiceVotesShare
No13,16560.0%
Yes8,76240.0%

21,927 valid selections.

No ahead by 4,403 votes (20.1 points).

Estimate: No >99% chance. It only asks whether the votes left could close the gap.

PROPOSITION 405

PROPOSITION 405: reported votes and shares
ChoiceVotesShare
Budget Increase, No18,90954.5%
Budget Increase, Yes15,78845.5%

34,697 valid selections.

No ahead by 3,121 votes (9.0 points).

Estimate: No >99% chance. It only asks whether the votes left could close the gap.

PROPOSITION 406

PROPOSITION 406: reported votes and shares
ChoiceVotesShare
Bond Approval, Yes18,22852.5%
Bond Approval, No16,46447.5%

34,692 valid selections.

Yes ahead by 1,764 votes (5.1 points).

Estimate: Yes 99% chance. It only asks whether the votes left could close the gap.

PROPOSITION 407

PROPOSITION 407: reported votes and shares
ChoiceVotesShare
Bond Approval, Yes15,20954.1%
Bond Approval, No12,88945.9%

28,098 valid selections.

Yes ahead by 2,320 votes (8.3 points).

Estimate: Yes >99% chance. It only asks whether the votes left could close the gap.

PROPOSITION 408

PROPOSITION 408: reported votes and shares
ChoiceVotesShare
Bond Approval, Yes2,66657.4%
Bond Approval, No1,98042.6%

4,646 valid selections.

Yes ahead by 686 votes (14.8 points).

Estimate: Yes >99% chance. It only asks whether the votes left could close the gap.

PROPOSITION 409

PROPOSITION 409: reported votes and shares
ChoiceVotesShare
Bond Approval, Yes7,05858.1%
Bond Approval, No5,09741.9%

12,155 valid selections.

Yes ahead by 1,961 votes (16.1 points).

Estimate: Yes >99% chance. It only asks whether the votes left could close the gap.

PROPOSITION 410

PROPOSITION 410: reported votes and shares
ChoiceVotesShare
Yes3,12152.7%
No2,80147.3%

5,922 valid selections.

Yes ahead by 320 votes (5.4 points).

Estimate: Yes >99% chance. It only asks whether the votes left could close the gap.

PROPOSITION 411

PROPOSITION 411: reported votes and shares
ChoiceVotesShare
Yes15,75165.3%
No8,36034.7%

24,111 valid selections.

Yes ahead by 7,391 votes (30.7 points).

Estimate: Yes >99% chance. It only asks whether the votes left could close the gap.

PROPOSITION 412

PROPOSITION 412: reported votes and shares
ChoiceVotesShare
Yes17,13170.5%
No7,17129.5%

24,302 valid selections.

Yes ahead by 9,960 votes (41.0 points).

Estimate: Yes >99% chance. It only asks whether the votes left could close the gap.

PROPOSITION 413

PROPOSITION 413: reported votes and shares
ChoiceVotesShare
Yes16,90769.8%
No7,30430.2%

24,211 valid selections.

Yes ahead by 9,603 votes (39.7 points).

Estimate: Yes >99% chance. It only asks whether the votes left could close the gap.

PROPOSITION 414

PROPOSITION 414: reported votes and shares
ChoiceVotesShare
Yes17,02270.8%
No7,00529.2%

24,027 valid selections.

Yes ahead by 10,017 votes (41.7 points).

Estimate: Yes >99% chance. It only asks whether the votes left could close the gap.

PROPOSITION 415

PROPOSITION 415: reported votes and shares
ChoiceVotesShare
Yes14,61161.8%
No9,02138.2%

23,632 valid selections.

Yes ahead by 5,590 votes (23.7 points).

Estimate: Yes >99% chance. It only asks whether the votes left could close the gap.

PROPOSITION 417

PROPOSITION 417: reported votes and shares
ChoiceVotesShare
No0—
Yes0—

0 valid selections.

No votes reported in this observation.

PROPOSITION 492

PROPOSITION 492: reported votes and shares
ChoiceVotesShare
No15,34269.0%
Yes6,89931.0%

22,241 valid selections.

No ahead by 8,443 votes (38.0 points).

Estimate: No >99% chance. It only asks whether the votes left could close the gap.

PROPOSITION 493

PROPOSITION 493: reported votes and shares
ChoiceVotesShare
No14,14863.5%
Yes8,14236.5%

22,290 valid selections.

No ahead by 6,006 votes (26.9 points).

Estimate: No >99% chance. It only asks whether the votes left could close the gap.

PROPOSITION 497

PROPOSITION 497: reported votes and shares
ChoiceVotesShare
No61,83553.5%
Yes53,68046.5%

115,515 valid selections.

No ahead by 8,155 votes (7.1 points).

Estimate: No >99% chance. It only asks whether the votes left could close the gap.

WICKENBURG U.S.D. NO. 9 QUESTION

WICKENBURG U.S.D. NO. 9 QUESTION: reported votes and shares
ChoiceVotesShare
Budget Override Continuation, Yes99561.1%
Budget Override Continuation, No63338.9%

1,628 valid selections.

Yes ahead by 362 votes (22.2 points).

Called statewide: Gosar. This is the county's share of a bigger contest.

Judges

JUDGE OF THE SUPERIOR COURT - DIV. 1

JUDGE OF THE SUPERIOR COURT - DIV. 1: reported votes and shares
CandidateVotesShare
Michael Mcgill75,11298.9%
Write-in8281.1%

75,940 valid selections.

Reported candidate selections; no local race call or seat outcome is inferred.

JUDGE OF THE SUPERIOR COURT - DIV. 2

JUDGE OF THE SUPERIOR COURT - DIV. 2: reported votes and shares
CandidateVotesShare
John Napper75,67099.0%
Write-in7691.0%

76,439 valid selections.

Reported candidate selections; no local race call or seat outcome is inferred.

JUDGE OF THE SUPERIOR COURT - DIV. 3

JUDGE OF THE SUPERIOR COURT - DIV. 3: reported votes and shares
CandidateVotesShare
Josh Butner74,66298.9%
Write-in8041.1%

75,466 valid selections.

Reported candidate selections; no local race call or seat outcome is inferred.

JUDGE OF THE SUPERIOR COURT - DIV. 5

JUDGE OF THE SUPERIOR COURT - DIV. 5: reported votes and shares
CandidateVotesShare
Henry Whitmer74,48899.0%
Write-in7771.0%

75,265 valid selections.

Reported candidate selections; no local race call or seat outcome is inferred.

JUDGE OF THE SUPERIOR COURT - DIV. 6

JUDGE OF THE SUPERIOR COURT - DIV. 6: reported votes and shares
CandidateVotesShare
Anna Young76,37599.0%
Write-in7351.0%

77,110 valid selections.

Reported candidate selections; no local race call or seat outcome is inferred.

JUSTICE OF THE PEACE: BAGDAD/YARNELL

JUSTICE OF THE PEACE: BAGDAD/YARNELL: reported votes and shares
CandidateVotesShare
Dennis Dowling R3,43698.9%
Write-in391.1%

3,475 valid selections.

Reported candidate selections; no local race call or seat outcome is inferred.

JUSTICE OF THE PEACE: MAYER

JUSTICE OF THE PEACE: MAYER: reported votes and shares
CandidateVotesShare
Ed Cocchiola R9,23698.0%
Write-in1902.0%

9,426 valid selections.

Reported candidate selections; no local race call or seat outcome is inferred.

JUSTICE OF THE PEACE: PRESCOTT

JUSTICE OF THE PEACE: PRESCOTT: reported votes and shares
CandidateVotesShare
Douglas Suits R51,50398.8%
Write-in6131.2%
Jeff Muckerman250.0%

52,141 valid selections.

Reported candidate selections; no local race call or seat outcome is inferred.

Estimate: Douglas Suits >99% chance. It only asks whether the votes left could close the gap.

JUSTICE OF THE PEACE: SELIGMAN

JUSTICE OF THE PEACE: SELIGMAN: reported votes and shares
CandidateVotesShare
Ben Emery R94297.1%
Write-in282.9%

970 valid selections.

Reported candidate selections; no local race call or seat outcome is inferred.

JUSTICE OF THE PEACE: VERDE VALLEY

JUSTICE OF THE PEACE: VERDE VALLEY: reported votes and shares
CandidateVotesShare
David Gordon R17,97498.0%
Write-in3582.0%

18,332 valid selections.

Reported candidate selections; no local race call or seat outcome is inferred.

John R. Lopez IV Arizona Supreme Court

LOPEZ IV, JOHN R. - JUSTICE OF THE SUPREME COURT: reported votes and shares
ChoiceVotesShare
Yes72,34979.2%
No18,96720.8%

91,316 valid selections.

Yes ahead by 53,382 votes (58.5 points).

Meets standards in the Commission on Judicial Performance Review · On the bench since 2017

At or above the typical judge in every category.

Share of people surveyed who rated John R. Lopez IV acceptable or better
Rated acceptable or betterScoreTypicalResponses
Legal ability 100% 97% 15
Integrity 100% 100% 15
Communication 100% 100% 19
Temperament 100% 100% 20
Administration 100% 100% 12

26 of 127 voluntary surveys returned, February–September 2025, the later of two survey periods. Typical, the gold mark, is the median of the 15 appeals and Supreme Court judges reviewed.

Estimate: Yes >99% chance. It only asks whether the votes left could close the gap.

County & local

BLACK CANYON CITY D.W.I.D. GOVERNING BOARD (4- YEAR TERM) vote for 2

BLACK CANYON CITY D.W.I.D. GOVERNING BOARD (4- YEAR TERM): reported votes and shares
CandidateVotesShare
Write-in37556.4%
Edward Rowe14421.7%
Jeremy Brueckner14221.4%
Shawn Collins40.6%
Donna Lisa Chandler00.0%

665 valid selections.

Reported candidate selections; no local race call or seat outcome is inferred.

Estimate: Edward Rowe and Jeremy Brueckner >99% chance for the last seat. It only asks whether the votes left could close the gap.

BOARD OF SUPERVISORS - DIST. 2

BOARD OF SUPERVISORS - DIST. 2: reported votes and shares
CandidateVotesShare
Marie Moore R15,98298.6%
Write-in2281.4%

16,210 valid selections.

Reported candidate selections; no local race call or seat outcome is inferred.

CLERK OF THE SUPERIOR COURT

CLERK OF THE SUPERIOR COURT: reported votes and shares
CandidateVotesShare
Charlie Van Landingham R83,25998.6%
Write-in1,1551.4%

84,414 valid selections.

Reported candidate selections; no local race call or seat outcome is inferred.

CONSTABLE: BAGDAD/YARNELL

CONSTABLE: BAGDAD/YARNELL: reported votes and shares
CandidateVotesShare
Bill Risen R3,50899.0%
Write-in361.0%

3,544 valid selections.

Reported candidate selections; no local race call or seat outcome is inferred.

CONSTABLE: MAYER

CONSTABLE: MAYER: reported votes and shares
CandidateVotesShare
Donny Oen R9,50899.0%
Write-in961.0%

9,604 valid selections.

Reported candidate selections; no local race call or seat outcome is inferred.

CONSTABLE: PRESCOTT

CONSTABLE: PRESCOTT: reported votes and shares
CandidateVotesShare
Ron Williams R51,68298.9%
Write-in5661.1%

52,248 valid selections.

Reported candidate selections; no local race call or seat outcome is inferred.

CONSTABLE: SELIGMAN

CONSTABLE: SELIGMAN: reported votes and shares
CandidateVotesShare
Schylar Cloudt R94098.3%
Write-in161.7%

956 valid selections.

Reported candidate selections; no local race call or seat outcome is inferred.

CONSTABLE: VERDE VALLEY

CONSTABLE: VERDE VALLEY: reported votes and shares
CandidateVotesShare
Brandon Rumpf R17,84798.0%
Write-in3552.0%

18,202 valid selections.

Reported candidate selections; no local race call or seat outcome is inferred.

PONDEROSA PARK D.W.I.D. (4-YEAR TERM) vote for 2

PONDEROSA PARK D.W.I.D. (4-YEAR TERM): reported votes and shares
CandidateVotesShare
Lisa Shannon12036.1%
Linda Shaughnessy10832.5%
Alan Weeks5416.3%
Jacqueline Wheeler4714.2%
Write-in30.9%

332 valid selections.

54 votes between the current last seat position and the next candidate.

Estimate: Lisa Shannon and Linda Shaughnessy >99% chance for the last seat. It only asks whether the votes left could close the gap.

SEDONA FIRE DISTRICT GOVERNING BOARD (4-YEAR TERM) vote for 3

SEDONA FIRE DISTRICT GOVERNING BOARD (4-YEAR TERM): reported votes and shares
CandidateVotesShare
Scott Springett4,52234.1%
Helen Mcneal4,51834.0%
Malcolm Boyd4,17831.5%
Write-in540.4%

13,272 valid selections.

Reported candidate selections; no local race call or seat outcome is inferred.

WILLIAMSON VALLEY FIRE DISTRICT GOVERNING BOARD (4-YEAR TERM) vote for 2

WILLIAMSON VALLEY FIRE DISTRICT GOVERNING BOARD (4-YEAR TERM): reported votes and shares
CandidateVotesShare
Karen E. Austermiller40943.6%
John Harbicht38040.5%
Tricia Wagner14915.9%
Write-in00.0%

938 valid selections.

231 votes between the current last seat position and the next candidate.

Estimate: Karen E. Austermiller and John Harbicht >99% chance for the last seat. It only asks whether the votes left could close the gap.

Cities & towns

CITY OF PEORIA MAYOR (4-YEAR TERM)

CITY OF PEORIA MAYOR (4-YEAR TERM): reported votes and shares
CandidateVotesShare
Art Miller0—
Michael Finn0—
Write-in0—

0 valid selections.

No votes reported in this observation.

TOWN OF DEWEY-HUMBOLDT COUNCIL MEMBER (4- YEAR TERM) vote for 2

TOWN OF DEWEY-HUMBOLDT COUNCIL MEMBER (4- YEAR TERM): reported votes and shares
CandidateVotesShare
Terry Nolan95427.6%
Ashley Preston90826.3%
Denise Rogers81123.4%
Jason Chisholm75521.8%
Write-in310.9%

3,459 valid selections.

97 votes between the current last seat position and the next candidate.

Estimate: Terry Nolan and Ashley Preston 93% chance for the last seat. It only asks whether the votes left could close the gap.

Schools

CANON E.S.D. #50 SCHOOL GOVERNING BOARD (4- YEAR TERM) vote for 3

CANON E.S.D. #50 SCHOOL GOVERNING BOARD (4- YEAR TERM): reported votes and shares
CandidateVotesShare
Raechel Wilkins40618.3%
Sharon Kelly38017.1%
Donald Allison37016.7%
Shawn Snelling36316.4%
Thomas Ruff33815.2%
Jeannie Glover33014.9%
Write-in321.4%

2,219 valid selections.

7 votes between the current last seat position and the next candidate.

Estimate: Raechel Wilkins, Sharon Kelly and Donald Allison 57% chance for the last seat. It only asks whether the votes left could close the gap.

KIRKLAND E.S.D. #23 SCHOOL GOVERNING BOARD (4- YEAR TERM) vote for 3

KIRKLAND E.S.D. #23 SCHOOL GOVERNING BOARD (4- YEAR TERM): reported votes and shares
CandidateVotesShare
Jennifer Mccracken24823.6%
Mark D. Middleton22621.5%
Sharmane Smith21620.6%
Irene Marley18517.6%
Rita Schwartz16715.9%
Write-in80.8%

1,050 valid selections.

31 votes between the current last seat position and the next candidate.

Estimate: Jennifer Mccracken, Mark D. Middleton and Sharmane Smith 93% chance for the last seat. It only asks whether the votes left could close the gap.

MAYER U.S.D. #43 SCHOOL GOVERNING BOARD (4- YEAR TERM) vote for 2

MAYER U.S.D. #43 SCHOOL GOVERNING BOARD (4- YEAR TERM): reported votes and shares
CandidateVotesShare
Mark Mathern90028.9%
Breanna Farnsworth82426.5%
Pamela Francen70622.7%
David Hunsaker66221.3%
Write-in210.7%

3,113 valid selections.

118 votes between the current last seat position and the next candidate.

Estimate: Mark Mathern and Breanna Farnsworth 97% chance for the last seat. It only asks whether the votes left could close the gap.

YAVAPAI COLLEGE DISTRICT 4 SCHOOL GOVERNING BOARD (6-YEAR TERM)

YAVAPAI COLLEGE DISTRICT 4 SCHOOL GOVERNING BOARD (6-YEAR TERM): reported votes and shares
CandidateVotesShare
Ryan Jones7,96940.2%
Linda Gray6,19231.2%
Kara Woods5,55828.0%
Write-in1250.6%

19,844 valid selections.

Ryan Jones ahead by 1,777 votes (9.0 points).

Estimate: Ryan Jones >99% chance. It only asks whether the votes left could close the gap.

YAVAPAI COLLEGE DISTRICT 5 SCHOOL GOVERNING BOARD (6-YEAR TERM)

YAVAPAI COLLEGE DISTRICT 5 SCHOOL GOVERNING BOARD (6-YEAR TERM): reported votes and shares
CandidateVotesShare
Stephen Bracety8,58897.5%
Write-in2162.5%

8,804 valid selections.

Reported candidate selections; no local race call or seat outcome is inferred.

Cities & towns

Largest first, using dated population estimates. Population describes the whole municipality and is not used to allocate votes. A place spanning counties has one canonical page linked from each containing county.

Presidential voting history

Final county returns from 2000–2024. Different offices and electorates make this context for 2026, not a like-for-like estimate of the current election's final result.

YearDemocratic votesRepublican votesAll votesMargin
200024,06340,14468,228R +23.6
200433,12753,46887,389R +23.3
200836,88961,19299,648R +24.4
201233,91864,468100,283R +30.5
201635,59071,330114,450R +31.2
202049,60191,529143,222R +29.3
202448,55998,577147,963R +33.8

Margin is Democratic minus Republican share of all valid votes. Historical returns are final; current returns remain unofficial. MIT Election Data and Science Lab (CC0 (MEDSL)); Polling Forecast; original VEST (CC BY 4.0 (VEST / Polling Forecast)); Polling Forecast; original MEDSL (CC0 (MEDSL); CC BY 4.0 (Polling Forecast redistribution)).

Sources & scope

We do not infer local winners, certification, turnout, remaining ballots or citywide or districtwide results from precinct percentages, population, county totals or the number of seats. Your own ballot depends on your registered address.