Arizona · 2026 election coverage

Greenlee County

2026 election results and ballot analysis across 31 contests in the county's official results file. Explore local offices, propositions and the communities within Greenlee County.

78% counted

An estimate, from the county's progress in the governor's race. How Arizona's count runs.

Official county results. These are the contests in the county's results file, not an address-specific sample ballot. Eligibility varies by district and precinct.

Results file posted Nov 4, 3:26 PM. Source checked Nov 5, 5:29 PM.

Covered contests: 31
Propositions with yes/no returns: 10
Incorporated cities & towns: 2

Observed returns, unofficial until certified. “Ahead” describes the current count; it is not a local race call. Candidate selections in multi-seat contests are not ballots. Precinct reporting does not establish how many ballots remain.

Reading the county count

The governor's race

2,067 valid candidate selections are reported for governor in this county observation. Biggs / Kerr ahead by 232 votes (11.2 points).

This is a county portion of a statewide contest. A county lead is not a statewide election outcome.

Where the count is close

Corporation Commissioner: 231 votes between the current last seat position and the next candidate.

The smallest verifiable seat-boundary gap among covered candidate contests with a known seat count. A gap is withheld if unassigned write-ins could change its ranking. District races show this county's portion.

Among the 10 covered propositions with yes/no choices, Yes is ahead in 8 and No in 2. Ties and unreported counts remain unresolved. These are observed leads, not declarations that a measure passed or failed.

Ballot & results

All named candidates and reported write-in groups are retained. Shares use valid candidate selections for that contest, excluding overvotes and undervotes. A multi-seat share is not the percentage of voters supporting a candidate.

Federal & state

Attorney General

Attorney General: reported votes and shares
Candidate	Votes	Share
Warren Petersen R	1,167	57.1%
Kris Mayes D	876	42.8%
Unassigned / unofficial write-ins	2	0.1%

2,045 valid selections.

Warren Petersen ahead by 291 votes (14.2 points).

Statewide forecast: Mayes >99%. This is the county's share of a bigger contest.

Corporation Commissioner vote for 2

Corporation Commissioner: reported votes and shares
Candidate	Votes	Share
Kevin Thompson R	1,114	29.7%
Ralph Heap R	1,025	27.3%
Clara Pratte D	794	21.2%
Jonathon Hill D	727	19.4%
Mike Cease G	86	2.3%
Unassigned / unofficial write-ins	2	0.1%

3,748 valid selections.

231 votes between the current last seat position and the next candidate.

Statewide forecast: Pratte >99%, Hill 98%. This is the county's share of a bigger contest.

Governor and Lieutenant Governor

Governor and Lieutenant Governor: reported votes and shares
Candidate	Votes	Share
Biggs / Kerr R	1,116	54.0%
Hobbs / Giles D	884	42.8%
Lombardo / Castillo G	39	1.9%
Hourihan / Harrolle Mohan N	27	1.3%
Unassigned / unofficial write-ins	1	0.0%
Gonzalez, Gertritrude R write-in	0	0.0%
Novoa, Alice R write-in	0	0.0%

2,067 valid selections.

Biggs / Kerr ahead by 232 votes (11.2 points).

Called statewide: Hobbs. This is the county's share of a bigger contest.

Secretary of State

Secretary of State: reported votes and shares
Candidate	Votes	Share
Alexander Kolodin R	1,133	55.6%
Adrian Fontes D	852	41.8%
Duwayne Collier G	51	2.5%
Unassigned / unofficial write-ins	0	0.0%

2,036 valid selections.

Alexander Kolodin ahead by 281 votes (13.8 points).

Statewide forecast: Fontes >99%. This is the county's share of a bigger contest.

State Mine Inspector

State Mine Inspector: reported votes and shares
Candidate	Votes	Share
Walter "les" Presmyk R	1,200	59.1%
Brian Matlock D	831	40.9%
Unassigned / unofficial write-ins	1	0.0%

2,032 valid selections.

Walter "les" Presmyk ahead by 369 votes (18.2 points).

Statewide forecast: Matlock 97%. This is the county's share of a bigger contest.

State Rep Dist. 19 vote for 2

State Rep Dist. 19: reported votes and shares
Candidate	Votes	Share
David Gowan R	1,125	30.8%
Lupe Diaz R	1,053	28.8%
Jackie O'donnell Anderson D	777	21.3%
Aiden Nicholette Swallow D	697	19.1%
Unassigned / unofficial write-ins	4	0.1%

3,656 valid selections.

276 votes between the current last seat position and the next candidate.

Statewide forecast: Gowan >99%, Diaz >99%. This is the county's share of a bigger contest.

State Senator Dist.19

State Senator Dist.19: reported votes and shares
Candidate	Votes	Share
Gail Griffin R	1,238	60.6%
Bob Karp D	802	39.3%
Unassigned / unofficial write-ins	3	0.1%

2,043 valid selections.

Gail Griffin ahead by 436 votes (21.3 points).

Statewide forecast: Griffin >99%. This is the county's share of a bigger contest.

State Treasurer

State Treasurer: reported votes and shares
Candidate	Votes	Share
Elijah Norton R	1,195	59.0%
Nick Mansour D	827	40.8%
Unassigned / unofficial write-ins	3	0.1%

2,025 valid selections.

Elijah Norton ahead by 368 votes (18.2 points).

Statewide forecast: Mansour >99%. This is the county's share of a bigger contest.

Superintendent of Public Instruction

Superintendent of Public Instruction: reported votes and shares
Candidate	Votes	Share
Kimberly Yee R	1,174	57.5%
Teresa Leyba Ruiz D	867	42.4%
Unassigned / unofficial write-ins	2	0.1%
Davis, Gerard G write-in	0	0.0%
Neal, Stephen N write-in	0	0.0%

2,043 valid selections.

Kimberly Yee ahead by 307 votes (15.0 points).

Statewide forecast: Ruiz 98%. This is the county's share of a bigger contest.

U.S. Rep Dist. 6

U.S. Rep Dist. 6: reported votes and shares
Candidate	Votes	Share
Juan Ciscomani R	1,181	57.3%
Joanna Mendoza D	824	40.0%
Jereme Lance Peters L	35	1.7%
Gary Swing G	21	1.0%
Unassigned / unofficial write-ins	1	0.0%
Dorland, Michael I write-in	0	0.0%

2,062 valid selections.

Juan Ciscomani ahead by 357 votes (17.3 points).

Called statewide: Mendoza. This is the county's share of a bigger contest.

Propositions

PROPOSITION 141

PROPOSITION 141: reported votes and shares
Choice	Votes	Share
Yes	1,083	54.3%
No	912	45.7%

1,995 valid selections.

Yes ahead by 171 votes (8.6 points).

Statewide forecast: Yes 83%. This is the county's share of a bigger contest.

PROPOSITION 142

PROPOSITION 142: reported votes and shares
Choice	Votes	Share
No	1,133	56.4%
Yes	876	43.6%

2,009 valid selections.

No ahead by 257 votes (12.8 points).

Statewide forecast: No >99%. This is the county's share of a bigger contest.

PROPOSITION 144

PROPOSITION 144: reported votes and shares
Choice	Votes	Share
Yes	1,135	55.7%
No	902	44.3%

2,037 valid selections.

Yes ahead by 233 votes (11.4 points).

Statewide forecast: No >99%. This is the county's share of a bigger contest.

PROPOSITION 316

PROPOSITION 316: reported votes and shares
Choice	Votes	Share
Yes	1,337	66.6%
No	670	33.4%

2,007 valid selections.

Yes ahead by 667 votes (33.2 points).

Statewide forecast: Yes >99%. This is the county's share of a bigger contest.

PROPOSITION 317

PROPOSITION 317: reported votes and shares
Choice	Votes	Share
Yes	1,385	68.2%
No	645	31.8%

2,030 valid selections.

Yes ahead by 740 votes (36.5 points).

Statewide forecast: Yes >99%. This is the county's share of a bigger contest.

PROPOSITION 318

PROPOSITION 318: reported votes and shares
Choice	Votes	Share
Yes	1,435	70.5%
No	600	29.5%

2,035 valid selections.

Yes ahead by 835 votes (41.0 points).

Statewide forecast: Yes >99%. This is the county's share of a bigger contest.

PROPOSITION 319

PROPOSITION 319: reported votes and shares
Choice	Votes	Share
Yes	1,266	62.4%
No	762	37.6%

2,028 valid selections.

Yes ahead by 504 votes (24.9 points).

Statewide forecast: Yes >99%. This is the county's share of a bigger contest.

PROPOSITION 320

PROPOSITION 320: reported votes and shares
Choice	Votes	Share
No	1,023	51.1%
Yes	979	48.9%

2,002 valid selections.

No ahead by 44 votes (2.2 points).

Statewide forecast: No 93%. This is the county's share of a bigger contest.

PROPOSITION 403

PROPOSITION 403: reported votes and shares
Choice	Votes	Share
Yes	342	64.3%
No	190	35.7%

532 valid selections.

Yes ahead by 152 votes (28.6 points).

Estimate: Yes >99% chance. It only asks whether the votes left could close the gap.

PROPOSITION 404

PROPOSITION 404: reported votes and shares
Choice	Votes	Share
Yes	572	66.1%
No	293	33.9%

865 valid selections.

Yes ahead by 279 votes (32.3 points).

Estimate: Yes >99% chance. It only asks whether the votes left could close the gap.

Judges

Judge of the Superior Court

Judge of the Superior Court: reported votes and shares
Candidate	Votes	Share
Jeremy Ford I	1,641	98.7%
Unassigned / unofficial write-ins	22	1.3%

1,663 valid selections.

Reported candidate selections; no local race call or seat outcome is inferred.

Justice of the Peace Precinct 1

Justice of the Peace Precinct 1: reported votes and shares
Candidate	Votes	Share
Grace Nabor I	639	56.2%
Ricardo Guerena I	492	43.3%
Unassigned / unofficial write-ins	5	0.4%

1,136 valid selections.

Grace Nabor ahead by 147 votes (12.9 points).

Estimate: Grace Nabor 99% chance. It only asks whether the votes left could close the gap.

Justice of the Peace Precinct 2

Justice of the Peace Precinct 2: reported votes and shares
Candidate	Votes	Share
Mindy Claridge R	767	99.2%
Unassigned / unofficial write-ins	6	0.8%

773 valid selections.

Reported candidate selections; no local race call or seat outcome is inferred.

Karl C. Eppich Court of Appeals, Division II

Retain Judge EPPICH, KARL: reported votes and shares
Choice	Votes	Share
Yes	1,298	74.3%
No	448	25.7%

1,746 valid selections.

Yes ahead by 850 votes (48.7 points).

Meets standards in the Commission on Judicial Performance Review · On the bench since 2017

At or above the typical judge in every category.

Share of people surveyed who rated Karl C. Eppich acceptable or better
Rated acceptable or better	Score	Typical	Responses
Legal ability	100%	97%	11
Integrity	100%	100%	11
Communication	100%	100%	9
Temperament	100%	100%	9
Administration	100%	100%	11

13 of 89 voluntary surveys returned, February–September 2025, the later of two survey periods. Typical, the gold mark, is the median of the 15 appeals and Supreme Court judges reviewed.

Estimate: Yes >99% chance. It only asks whether the votes left could close the gap.

Lacey Stover Gard Court of Appeals, Division II

Retain Judge GARD, LACEY STOVER: reported votes and shares
Choice	Votes	Share
Yes	1,301	74.6%
No	444	25.4%

1,745 valid selections.

Yes ahead by 857 votes (49.1 points).

Meets standards in the Commission on Judicial Performance Review · On the bench since 2023

Furthest below typical: Legal ability, 90% against 97%.

Share of people surveyed who rated Lacey Stover Gard acceptable or better
Rated acceptable or better	Score	Typical	Responses
Legal ability	90%	97%	26
Integrity	95%	100%	22
Communication	93%	100%	11
Temperament	91%	100%	11
Administration	100%	100%	25

31 of 141 voluntary surveys returned, February–September 2025, the later of two survey periods. Typical, the gold mark, is the median of the 15 appeals and Supreme Court judges reviewed.

Estimate: Yes >99% chance. It only asks whether the votes left could close the gap.

Christopher J. O'Neil Court of Appeals, Division II

Retain Judge O'NEIL, CHRISTOPHER: reported votes and shares
Choice	Votes	Share
Yes	1,314	75.7%
No	421	24.3%

1,735 valid selections.

Yes ahead by 893 votes (51.5 points).

Meets standards in the Commission on Judicial Performance Review · On the bench since 2023

Share of people surveyed who rated Christopher J. O'Neil acceptable or better
Rated acceptable or better	Score	Typical	Responses
Legal ability	94%	97%	18
Integrity	100%	100%	16
Communication	100%	100%	11
Temperament	100%	100%	11
Administration	100%	100%	14

22 of 102 voluntary surveys returned, February–September 2025, the later of two survey periods. Typical, the gold mark, is the median of the 15 appeals and Supreme Court judges reviewed.

Estimate: Yes >99% chance. It only asks whether the votes left could close the gap.

John R. Lopez IV Arizona Supreme Court

Retain Justice LOPEZ IV, JOHN: reported votes and shares
Choice	Votes	Share
Yes	1,302	73.6%
No	468	26.4%

1,770 valid selections.

Yes ahead by 834 votes (47.1 points).

Meets standards in the Commission on Judicial Performance Review · On the bench since 2017

At or above the typical judge in every category.

Share of people surveyed who rated John R. Lopez IV acceptable or better
Rated acceptable or better	Score	Typical	Responses
Legal ability	100%	97%	15
Integrity	100%	100%	15
Communication	100%	100%	19
Temperament	100%	100%	20
Administration	100%	100%	12

26 of 127 voluntary surveys returned, February–September 2025, the later of two survey periods. Typical, the gold mark, is the median of the 15 appeals and Supreme Court judges reviewed.

Estimate: Yes >99% chance. It only asks whether the votes left could close the gap.

County & local

Board for GIFT-Moren

Board for GIFT-Moren: reported votes and shares
Candidate	Votes	Share
Sherry Carbajal	742	73.1%
James Bryce	271	26.7%
Unassigned / unofficial write-ins	2	0.2%

1,015 valid selections.

Sherry Carbajal ahead by 471 votes (46.4 points).

Estimate: Sherry Carbajal >99% chance. It only asks whether the votes left could close the gap.

Clerk of the Superior Court

Clerk of the Superior Court: reported votes and shares
Candidate	Votes	Share
Madeline Montoya D	1,582	96.8%
Unassigned / unofficial write-ins	52	3.2%

1,634 valid selections.

Reported candidate selections; no local race call or seat outcome is inferred.

Constable Precinct 1

Constable Precinct 1: reported votes and shares
Candidate	Votes	Share
Manuel Nabor I	961	98.1%
Unassigned / unofficial write-ins	19	1.9%

980 valid selections.

Reported candidate selections; no local race call or seat outcome is inferred.

Constable Precinct 2

Constable Precinct 2: reported votes and shares
Candidate	Votes	Share
Tom Haught I	747	99.3%
Unassigned / unofficial write-ins	5	0.7%

752 valid selections.

Reported candidate selections; no local race call or seat outcome is inferred.

Cities & towns

Largest first, using dated population estimates. Population describes the whole municipality and is not used to allocate votes. A place spanning counties has one canonical page linked from each containing county.

Clifton3,752 · 2025 estimate
Duncan672 · 2025 estimate

Presidential voting history

Final county returns from 2000–2024. Different offices and electorates make this context for 2026, not a like-for-like estimate of the current election's final result.

Year	Democratic votes	Republican votes	All votes	Margin
2000	1,216	1,619	2,960	R +13.6
2004	1,146	1,899	3,067	R +24.6
2008	1,165	1,712	2,913	R +18.8
2012	1,310	1,592	2,974	R +9.5
2016	1,092	1,892	3,270	R +24.5
2020	1,182	2,433	3,685	R +33.9
2024	954	2,309	3,298	R +41.1

Margin is Democratic minus Republican share of all valid votes. Historical returns are final; current returns remain unofficial. MIT Election Data and Science Lab (CC0 (MEDSL)); Polling Forecast; original VEST (CC BY 4.0 (VEST / Polling Forecast)); Polling Forecast; original MEDSL (CC0 (MEDSL); CC BY 4.0 (Polling Forecast redistribution)).

Sources & scope

Reported contest data: Greenlee County official results file.
Greenlee County election office for local ballot information, official returns and address-specific resources.
Population: U.S. Census Bureau, July 1, 2025 estimates. Counts are for residents, not registered voters or ballots.
Election rules and reporting limits: our methodology. Judicial background: Arizona judicial performance review.

We do not infer local winners, certification, turnout, remaining ballots or citywide or districtwide results from precinct percentages, population, county totals or the number of seats. Your own ballot depends on your registered address.