Arizona · 2026 election coverage

Cochise County

2026 election results and ballot analysis across 65 contests in the county's official results file. Explore local offices, propositions and the communities within Cochise County.

84% counted

An estimate, from the county's progress in the governor's race. How Arizona's count runs.

Official county results. These are the contests in the county's results file, not an address-specific sample ballot. Eligibility varies by district and precinct.

Results file posted Nov 5, 5:12 PM. Source checked Nov 5, 5:29 PM.

Covered contests: 65
Propositions with yes/no returns: 18
Incorporated cities & towns: 7

Observed returns, unofficial until certified. “Ahead” describes the current count; it is not a local race call. Candidate selections in multi-seat contests are not ballots. Precinct reporting does not establish how many ballots remain.

Reading the county count

The governor's race

42,625 valid candidate selections are reported for governor in this county observation. Andy Biggs / Sine Kerr ahead by 2,704 votes (6.3 points).

This is a county portion of a statewide contest. A county lead is not a statewide election outcome.

Where the count is close

City of Sierra Vista Council Member: 39 votes between the current last seat position and the next candidate.

The smallest verifiable seat-boundary gap among covered candidate contests with a known seat count. A gap is withheld if unassigned write-ins could change its ranking. District races show this county's portion.

Among the 18 covered propositions with yes/no choices, Yes is ahead in 17 and No in 1. Ties and unreported counts remain unresolved. These are observed leads, not declarations that a measure passed or failed.

Ballot & results

All named candidates and reported write-in groups are retained. Shares use valid candidate selections for that contest, excluding overvotes and undervotes. A multi-seat share is not the percentage of voters supporting a candidate.

Federal & state

Attorney General

Attorney General: reported votes and shares
Candidate	Votes	Share
Warren Petersen R	23,153	54.7%
Kris Mayes D	19,101	45.2%
Unofficial Write-in	41	0.1%
Unassigned Write-in	3	0.0%

42,298 valid selections. 55 of 55 precincts reporting.

Warren Petersen ahead by 4,052 votes (9.6 points).

Statewide forecast: Mayes >99%. This is the county's share of a bigger contest.

Corporation Commissioner vote for 2

Corporation Commissioner: reported votes and shares
Candidate	Votes	Share
Kevin Thompson R	22,523	29.2%
Ralph Heap R	20,699	26.9%
Clara Pratte D	16,799	21.8%
Jonathon Hill D	15,486	20.1%
Mike Cease G	1,465	1.9%
Unofficial Write-in	40	0.1%
Unassigned Write-in	5	0.0%

77,017 valid selections. 55 of 55 precincts reporting.

3,900 votes between the current last seat position and the next candidate.

Statewide forecast: Pratte >99%, Hill 98%. This is the county's share of a bigger contest.

Governor and Lieutenant Governor

Governor and Lieutenant Governor: reported votes and shares
Candidate	Votes	Share
Andy Biggs / Sine Kerr R	22,152	52.0%
Katie Hobbs / John Giles D	19,448	45.6%
Risa Lombardo / Lisa Castillo G	500	1.2%
Teri Ann Hourihan / Angela Harrolle Mohan N	482	1.1%
Unofficial Write-in	36	0.1%
Alice Novoa R	5	0.0%
Gertritrude Gonzalez R	1	0.0%
Unassigned Write-in	1	0.0%

42,625 valid selections. 55 of 55 precincts reporting.

Andy Biggs / Sine Kerr ahead by 2,704 votes (6.3 points).

Called statewide: Hobbs. This is the county's share of a bigger contest.

Secretary of State

Secretary of State: reported votes and shares
Candidate	Votes	Share
Alexander Kolodin R	23,100	54.6%
Adrian Fontes D	18,391	43.5%
Duwayne Collier G	801	1.9%
Unofficial Write-in	29	0.1%
Unassigned Write-in	3	0.0%

42,324 valid selections. 55 of 55 precincts reporting.

Alexander Kolodin ahead by 4,709 votes (11.1 points).

Statewide forecast: Fontes >99%. This is the county's share of a bigger contest.

State Mine Inspector

State Mine Inspector: reported votes and shares
Candidate	Votes	Share
Walter "Les" Presmyk R	23,978	57.2%
Brian Matlock D	17,912	42.7%
Unofficial Write-in	46	0.1%
Unassigned Write-in	4	0.0%

41,940 valid selections. 55 of 55 precincts reporting.

Walter "Les" Presmyk ahead by 6,066 votes (14.5 points).

Statewide forecast: Matlock 97%. This is the county's share of a bigger contest.

State Representative - District No. 19 vote for 2

State Representative - District No. 19: reported votes and shares
Candidate	Votes	Share
David Gowan R	21,242	31.3%
Lupe Diaz R	19,460	28.6%
Jackie O'Donnell Anderson D	13,943	20.5%
Aiden Nicholette Swallow D	13,236	19.5%
Unofficial Write-in	75	0.1%
Unassigned Write-in	4	0.0%

67,960 valid selections. 48 of 48 precincts reporting.

5,517 votes between the current last seat position and the next candidate.

Statewide forecast: Gowan >99%, Diaz >99%. This is the county's share of a bigger contest.

State Representative - District No. 21 vote for 2

State Representative - District No. 21: reported votes and shares
Candidate	Votes	Share
Miranda Lopez D	2,197	38.0%
Consuelo Hernandez D	2,143	37.0%
Christopher Kibbey R	1,428	24.7%
Unofficial Write-in	17	0.3%
Unassigned Write-in	2	0.0%

5,787 valid selections. 7 of 7 precincts reporting.

715 votes between the current last seat position and the next candidate.

Statewide forecast: Lopez >99%, Hernandez >99%. This is the county's share of a bigger contest.

State Senator - District No. 19

State Senator - District No. 19: reported votes and shares
Candidate	Votes	Share
Gail Griffin R	22,922	59.8%
Bob Karp D	15,352	40.0%
Unofficial Write-in	67	0.2%
Unassigned Write-in	7	0.0%

38,348 valid selections. 48 of 48 precincts reporting.

Gail Griffin ahead by 7,570 votes (19.7 points).

Statewide forecast: Griffin >99%. This is the county's share of a bigger contest.

State Senator - District No. 21

State Senator - District No. 21: reported votes and shares
Candidate	Votes	Share
Rosanna Gabaldón D	2,491	63.7%
Esteban Flores R	1,419	36.3%
Unofficial Write-in	3	0.1%
Unassigned Write-in	0	0.0%

3,913 valid selections. 7 of 7 precincts reporting.

Rosanna Gabaldón ahead by 1,072 votes (27.4 points).

Statewide forecast: Gabaldón >99%. This is the county's share of a bigger contest.

State Treasurer

State Treasurer: reported votes and shares
Candidate	Votes	Share
Elijah Norton R	23,914	56.9%
Nick Mansour D	18,090	43.0%
Unofficial Write-in	55	0.1%
Unassigned Write-in	3	0.0%

42,062 valid selections. 55 of 55 precincts reporting.

Elijah Norton ahead by 5,824 votes (13.8 points).

Statewide forecast: Mansour >99%. This is the county's share of a bigger contest.

Superintendent of Public Instruction

Superintendent of Public Instruction: reported votes and shares
Candidate	Votes	Share
Kimberly Yee R	24,036	57.1%
Teresa Leyba Ruiz D	17,992	42.7%
Unofficial Write-in	50	0.1%
Stephen Neal Jr. N	14	0.0%
Gerard Davis G	7	0.0%
Unassigned Write-in	4	0.0%

42,103 valid selections. 55 of 55 precincts reporting.

Kimberly Yee ahead by 6,044 votes (14.4 points).

Statewide forecast: Ruiz 98%. This is the county's share of a bigger contest.

U.S. Representative in Congress - District No. 6

U.S. Representative in Congress - District No. 6: reported votes and shares
Candidate	Votes	Share
Juan Ciscomani R	21,278	60.9%
JoAnna Mendoza D	12,545	35.9%
Jereme Lance Peters L	647	1.9%
Gary Swing G	429	1.2%
Unofficial Write-in	33	0.1%
Michael Dorland I	19	0.1%
Unassigned Write-in	5	0.0%

34,956 valid selections. 43 of 43 precincts reporting.

Juan Ciscomani ahead by 8,733 votes (25.0 points).

Called statewide: Mendoza. This is the county's share of a bigger contest.

U.S. Representative in Congress - District No. 7

U.S. Representative in Congress - District No. 7: reported votes and shares
Candidate	Votes	Share
Adelita Grijalva D	5,229	68.9%
Daniel Francis Butierez Sr. R	2,331	30.7%
Unofficial Write-in	23	0.3%
Unassigned Write-in	1	0.0%

7,584 valid selections. 12 of 12 precincts reporting.

Adelita Grijalva ahead by 2,898 votes (38.2 points).

Called statewide: Grijalva. This is the county's share of a bigger contest.

Propositions

City of Bisbee Proposition 400

City of Bisbee Proposition 400: reported votes and shares
Choice	Votes	Share
Yes	1,420	69.9%
No	612	30.1%

2,032 valid selections. 3 of 3 precincts reporting.

Yes ahead by 808 votes (39.8 points).

Estimate: Yes >99% chance. It only asks whether the votes left could close the gap.

City of Bisbee Proposition 401

City of Bisbee Proposition 401: reported votes and shares
Choice	Votes	Share
Yes	1,326	63.4%
No	766	36.6%

2,092 valid selections. 3 of 3 precincts reporting.

Yes ahead by 560 votes (26.8 points).

Estimate: Yes >99% chance. It only asks whether the votes left could close the gap.

City of Bisbee Proposition 402

City of Bisbee Proposition 402: reported votes and shares
Choice	Votes	Share
Yes	1,600	76.7%
No	486	23.3%

2,086 valid selections. 3 of 3 precincts reporting.

Yes ahead by 1,114 votes (53.4 points).

Estimate: Yes >99% chance. It only asks whether the votes left could close the gap.

City of Bisbee Proposition 403

City of Bisbee Proposition 403: reported votes and shares
Choice	Votes	Share
Yes	1,677	80.7%
No	402	19.3%

2,079 valid selections. 3 of 3 precincts reporting.

Yes ahead by 1,275 votes (61.3 points).

Estimate: Yes >99% chance. It only asks whether the votes left could close the gap.

City of Bisbee Proposition 404

City of Bisbee Proposition 404: reported votes and shares
Choice	Votes	Share
Yes	1,218	58.7%
No	856	41.3%

2,074 valid selections. 3 of 3 precincts reporting.

Yes ahead by 362 votes (17.5 points).

Estimate: Yes >99% chance. It only asks whether the votes left could close the gap.

City of Bisbee Proposition 405

City of Bisbee Proposition 405: reported votes and shares
Choice	Votes	Share
Yes	1,679	82.2%
No	364	17.8%

2,043 valid selections. 3 of 3 precincts reporting.

Yes ahead by 1,315 votes (64.4 points).

Estimate: Yes >99% chance. It only asks whether the votes left could close the gap.

City of Bisbee Proposition 406

City of Bisbee Proposition 406: reported votes and shares
Choice	Votes	Share
Yes	1,794	87.0%
No	268	13.0%

2,062 valid selections. 3 of 3 precincts reporting.

Yes ahead by 1,526 votes (74.0 points).

Estimate: Yes >99% chance. It only asks whether the votes left could close the gap.

City of Bisbee Proposition 407

City of Bisbee Proposition 407: reported votes and shares
Choice	Votes	Share
Yes	1,870	89.8%
No	212	10.2%

2,082 valid selections. 3 of 3 precincts reporting.

Yes ahead by 1,658 votes (79.6 points).

Estimate: Yes >99% chance. It only asks whether the votes left could close the gap.

N. Cochise County Hosp. Dist. Question 409

N. Cochise County Hosp. Dist. Question 409: reported votes and shares
Choice	Votes	Share
Yes	1,975	61.5%
No	1,235	38.5%

3,210 valid selections. 8 of 8 precincts reporting.

Yes ahead by 740 votes (23.1 points).

Estimate: Yes >99% chance. It only asks whether the votes left could close the gap.

PROPOSITION 141

PROPOSITION 141: reported votes and shares
Choice	Votes	Share
Yes	24,582	59.6%
No	16,635	40.4%

41,217 valid selections. 55 of 55 precincts reporting.

Yes ahead by 7,947 votes (19.3 points).

Statewide forecast: Yes 83%. This is the county's share of a bigger contest.

PROPOSITION 142

PROPOSITION 142: reported votes and shares
Choice	Votes	Share
No	22,207	53.9%
Yes	19,014	46.1%

41,221 valid selections. 55 of 55 precincts reporting.

No ahead by 3,193 votes (7.7 points).

Statewide forecast: No >99%. This is the county's share of a bigger contest.

PROPOSITION 144

PROPOSITION 144: reported votes and shares
Choice	Votes	Share
Yes	23,321	56.2%
No	18,177	43.8%

41,498 valid selections. 55 of 55 precincts reporting.

Yes ahead by 5,144 votes (12.4 points).

Statewide forecast: No >99%. This is the county's share of a bigger contest.

PROPOSITION 316

PROPOSITION 316: reported votes and shares
Choice	Votes	Share
Yes	28,400	68.9%
No	12,833	31.1%

41,233 valid selections. 55 of 55 precincts reporting.

Yes ahead by 15,567 votes (37.8 points).

Statewide forecast: Yes >99%. This is the county's share of a bigger contest.

PROPOSITION 317

PROPOSITION 317: reported votes and shares
Choice	Votes	Share
Yes	27,720	67.2%
No	13,549	32.8%

41,269 valid selections. 55 of 55 precincts reporting.

Yes ahead by 14,171 votes (34.3 points).

Statewide forecast: Yes >99%. This is the county's share of a bigger contest.

PROPOSITION 318

PROPOSITION 318: reported votes and shares
Choice	Votes	Share
Yes	28,564	69.4%
No	12,582	30.6%

41,146 valid selections. 55 of 55 precincts reporting.

Yes ahead by 15,982 votes (38.8 points).

Statewide forecast: Yes >99%. This is the county's share of a bigger contest.

PROPOSITION 319

PROPOSITION 319: reported votes and shares
Choice	Votes	Share
Yes	26,423	64.7%
No	14,387	35.3%

40,810 valid selections. 55 of 55 precincts reporting.

Yes ahead by 12,036 votes (29.5 points).

Statewide forecast: Yes >99%. This is the county's share of a bigger contest.

PROPOSITION 320

PROPOSITION 320: reported votes and shares
Choice	Votes	Share
Yes	22,670	56.0%
No	17,804	44.0%

40,474 valid selections. 55 of 55 precincts reporting.

Yes ahead by 4,866 votes (12.0 points).

Statewide forecast: No 93%. This is the county's share of a bigger contest.

Sierra Vista General Plan Question 408

Sierra Vista General Plan Question 408: reported votes and shares
Choice	Votes	Share
Yes	10,311	79.4%
No	2,682	20.6%

12,993 valid selections. 17 of 17 precincts reporting.

Yes ahead by 7,629 votes (58.7 points).

Estimate: Yes >99% chance. It only asks whether the votes left could close the gap.

Judges

Judge of the Superior Court Div. 1

Judge of the Superior Court Div. 1: reported votes and shares
Candidate	Votes	Share
Larson, Joel	31,325	98.0%
Write-in: Unofficial	595	1.9%
Write-in: Unassigned	43	0.1%

31,963 valid selections. 55 of 55 precincts reporting.

Larson, Joel ahead by 30,730 votes (96.1 points).

Estimate: Larson, Joel >99% chance. It only asks whether the votes left could close the gap.

Judge of the Superior Court Div. 2

Judge of the Superior Court Div. 2: reported votes and shares
Candidate	Votes	Share
Champagne, Deana	30,573	98.2%
Write-in: Unofficial	515	1.7%
Write-in: Unassigned	36	0.1%

31,124 valid selections. 55 of 55 precincts reporting.

Champagne, Deana ahead by 30,058 votes (96.6 points).

Estimate: Champagne, Deana >99% chance. It only asks whether the votes left could close the gap.

Judge of the Superior Court Div. 3

Judge of the Superior Court Div. 3: reported votes and shares
Candidate	Votes	Share
Thorn, David	29,218	97.5%
Write-in: Unofficial	709	2.4%
Write-in: Unassigned	55	0.2%

29,982 valid selections. 55 of 55 precincts reporting.

Thorn, David ahead by 28,509 votes (95.1 points).

Estimate: Thorn, David >99% chance. It only asks whether the votes left could close the gap.

Justice of the Peace Prec. 1

Justice of the Peace Prec. 1: reported votes and shares
Candidate	Votes	Share
Poppe, Janus D	3,656	95.3%
Write-in: Unofficial	171	4.5%
Write-in: Unassigned	11	0.3%

3,838 valid selections. 11 of 11 precincts reporting.

Poppe, Janus ahead by 3,485 votes (90.8 points).

Estimate: Poppe, Janus >99% chance. It only asks whether the votes left could close the gap.

Justice of the Peace Prec. 2

Justice of the Peace Prec. 2: reported votes and shares
Candidate	Votes	Share
Flores, Juan Pablo D	2,865	68.2%
Crucilla, Christopher R	1,322	31.5%
Write-in: Unofficial	15	0.4%
Write-in: Unassigned	1	0.0%

4,203 valid selections. 9 of 9 precincts reporting.

Flores, Juan Pablo ahead by 1,543 votes (36.7 points).

Estimate: Flores, Juan Pablo >99% chance. It only asks whether the votes left could close the gap.

Justice of the Peace Prec. 3

Justice of the Peace Prec. 3: reported votes and shares
Candidate	Votes	Share
Judd, Randy R	4,175	97.8%
Write-in: Unofficial	90	2.1%
Write-in: Unassigned	5	0.1%

4,270 valid selections. 5 of 5 precincts reporting.

Judd, Randy ahead by 4,085 votes (95.7 points).

Estimate: Judd, Randy >99% chance. It only asks whether the votes left could close the gap.

Justice of the Peace Prec. 4

Justice of the Peace Prec. 4: reported votes and shares
Candidate	Votes	Share
Ward, Trevor R	2,630	98.1%
Write-in: Unofficial	49	1.8%
Write-in: Unassigned	2	0.1%

2,681 valid selections. 5 of 5 precincts reporting.

Ward, Trevor ahead by 2,581 votes (96.3 points).

Estimate: Ward, Trevor >99% chance. It only asks whether the votes left could close the gap.

Justice of the Peace Prec. 5

Justice of the Peace Prec. 5: reported votes and shares
Candidate	Votes	Share
Curfman, Kenneth R	17,948	97.5%
Write-in: Unofficial	428	2.3%
Write-in: Unassigned	24	0.1%

18,400 valid selections. 23 of 23 precincts reporting.

Curfman, Kenneth ahead by 17,520 votes (95.2 points).

Estimate: Curfman, Kenneth >99% chance. It only asks whether the votes left could close the gap.

Justice of the Peace Prec. 6

Justice of the Peace Prec. 6: reported votes and shares
Candidate	Votes	Share
Adame, Ruben D	176	93.6%
Write-in: Unofficial	12	6.4%
Write-in: Unassigned	0	0.0%

188 valid selections. 2 of 2 precincts reporting.

Adame, Ruben ahead by 164 votes (87.2 points).

Christopher J. O'Neil Court of Appeals, Division II

Shall Judge Christopher O’Neil, Judge of the Court of Appeals Division II, be retained in office?: reported votes and shares
Choice	Votes	Share
Yes	27,021	78.5%
No	7,418	21.5%

34,439 valid selections. 55 of 55 precincts reporting.

Yes ahead by 19,603 votes (56.9 points).

Meets standards in the Commission on Judicial Performance Review · On the bench since 2023

Share of people surveyed who rated Christopher J. O'Neil acceptable or better
Rated acceptable or better	Score	Typical	Responses
Legal ability	94%	97%	18
Integrity	100%	100%	16
Communication	100%	100%	11
Temperament	100%	100%	11
Administration	100%	100%	14

22 of 102 voluntary surveys returned, February–September 2025, the later of two survey periods. Typical, the gold mark, is the median of the 15 appeals and Supreme Court judges reviewed.

Statewide forecast: Yes >99%. This is the county's share of a bigger contest.

Karl C. Eppich Court of Appeals, Division II

Shall Judge Karl Eppich, Judge of the Court of Appeals Division II, be retained in office?: reported votes and shares
Choice	Votes	Share
Yes	27,208	77.0%
No	8,138	23.0%

35,346 valid selections. 55 of 55 precincts reporting.

Yes ahead by 19,070 votes (54.0 points).

Meets standards in the Commission on Judicial Performance Review · On the bench since 2017

At or above the typical judge in every category.

Share of people surveyed who rated Karl C. Eppich acceptable or better
Rated acceptable or better	Score	Typical	Responses
Legal ability	100%	97%	11
Integrity	100%	100%	11
Communication	100%	100%	9
Temperament	100%	100%	9
Administration	100%	100%	11

13 of 89 voluntary surveys returned, February–September 2025, the later of two survey periods. Typical, the gold mark, is the median of the 15 appeals and Supreme Court judges reviewed.

Statewide forecast: Yes >99%. This is the county's share of a bigger contest.

Lacey Stover Gard Court of Appeals, Division II

Shall Judge Lacey Stover Gard, Judge of the Court of Appeals Division II, be retained in office?: reported votes and shares
Choice	Votes	Share
Yes	26,998	77.7%
No	7,740	22.3%

34,738 valid selections. 55 of 55 precincts reporting.

Yes ahead by 19,258 votes (55.4 points).

Meets standards in the Commission on Judicial Performance Review · On the bench since 2023

Furthest below typical: Legal ability, 90% against 97%.

Share of people surveyed who rated Lacey Stover Gard acceptable or better
Rated acceptable or better	Score	Typical	Responses
Legal ability	90%	97%	26
Integrity	95%	100%	22
Communication	93%	100%	11
Temperament	91%	100%	11
Administration	100%	100%	25

31 of 141 voluntary surveys returned, February–September 2025, the later of two survey periods. Typical, the gold mark, is the median of the 15 appeals and Supreme Court judges reviewed.

Statewide forecast: Yes >99%. This is the county's share of a bigger contest.

John R. Lopez IV Arizona Supreme Court

Shall Justice John Lopez IV, Justice of the Supreme Court be retained in office?: reported votes and shares
Choice	Votes	Share
Yes	26,930	74.9%
No	9,039	25.1%

35,969 valid selections. 55 of 55 precincts reporting.

Yes ahead by 17,891 votes (49.7 points).

Meets standards in the Commission on Judicial Performance Review · On the bench since 2017

At or above the typical judge in every category.

Share of people surveyed who rated John R. Lopez IV acceptable or better
Rated acceptable or better	Score	Typical	Responses
Legal ability	100%	97%	15
Integrity	100%	100%	15
Communication	100%	100%	19
Temperament	100%	100%	20
Administration	100%	100%	12

26 of 127 voluntary surveys returned, February–September 2025, the later of two survey periods. Typical, the gold mark, is the median of the 15 appeals and Supreme Court judges reviewed.

Statewide forecast: Yes >99%. This is the county's share of a bigger contest.

County & local

Board Member Mescal J6 Fire District vote for 3

Board Member Mescal J6 Fire District: reported votes and shares
Candidate	Votes	Share
Law, Dana	455	21.1%
Nervik, Mike	380	17.6%
Wise, Deborah	380	17.6%
Temple II, Wade	348	16.1%
Andrews, Bruce	338	15.7%
Libercci, Stephanie	243	11.3%
Write-in: Unofficial	12	0.6%
Write-in: Unassigned	0	0.0%

2,156 valid selections. 2 of 2 precincts reporting.

32 votes between the current last seat position and the next candidate.

Estimate: Law, Dana, Nervik, Mike and Wise, Deborah 69% chance for the last seat. It only asks whether the votes left could close the gap.

Board Member Palominas Fire District vote for 3

Board Member Palominas Fire District: reported votes and shares
Candidate	Votes	Share
Thrasher, Sandra	738	21.1%
Stoner, Tommy	731	20.9%
Montgomery, Robert	669	19.2%
Maas, Neal	467	13.4%
Clemons, Bowie	465	13.3%
Wechsler, Phil	396	11.3%
Write-in: Unofficial	24	0.7%
Write-in: Unassigned	2	0.1%

3,492 valid selections. 6 of 6 precincts reporting.

202 votes between the current last seat position and the next candidate.

Estimate: Thrasher, Sandra, Stoner, Tommy and Montgomery, Robert 96% chance for the last seat. It only asks whether the votes left could close the gap.

Board Member San Simon Fire District vote for 2

Board Member San Simon Fire District: reported votes and shares
Candidate	Votes	Share
Guzman, Fernando	88	42.3%
Fickett, Pati	76	36.5%
Phifer, Rebecca "Becky" J.	35	16.8%
Sparkman, Mary	9	4.3%
Write-in: Gray, Jennifer	0	0.0%
Write-in: Unassigned	0	0.0%
Write-in: Unofficial	0	0.0%

208 valid selections. 1 of 1 precincts reporting.

41 votes between the current last seat position and the next candidate.

Estimate: Guzman, Fernando and Fickett, Pati >99% chance for the last seat. It only asks whether the votes left could close the gap.

Board Member San Simon Water District vote for 2

Board Member San Simon Water District: reported votes and shares
Candidate	Votes	Share
Hooker, Clarence	51	44.7%
Fickett, Robert "Chuck"	46	40.4%
Noland, Jacqueline	13	11.4%
Sparkman, Mary	4	3.5%
Write-in: Unassigned	0	0.0%
Write-in: Unofficial	0	0.0%

114 valid selections. 1 of 1 precincts reporting.

33 votes between the current last seat position and the next candidate.

Clerk of the Superior Court

Clerk of the Superior Court: reported votes and shares
Candidate	Votes	Share
Hunley, Amy J. R	30,926	97.3%
Write-in: Unassigned	740	2.3%
Write-in: Unofficial	119	0.4%

31,785 valid selections. 55 of 55 precincts reporting.

Hunley, Amy J. ahead by 30,186 votes (95.0 points).

Estimate: Hunley, Amy J. >99% chance. It only asks whether the votes left could close the gap.

Constable Prec. 1

Constable Prec. 1: reported votes and shares
Candidate	Votes	Share
Write-in: Unofficial	370	96.4%
Write-in: Unassigned	14	3.6%

384 valid selections. 11 of 11 precincts reporting.

Write-in: Unofficial ahead by 356 votes (92.7 points).

Estimate: Write-in: Unofficial >99% chance. It only asks whether the votes left could close the gap.

Constable Prec. 2

Constable Prec. 2: reported votes and shares
Candidate	Votes	Share
Write-in: Unofficial	351	92.6%
Write-in: Unassigned	28	7.4%

379 valid selections. 9 of 9 precincts reporting.

Write-in: Unofficial ahead by 323 votes (85.2 points).

Estimate: Write-in: Unofficial >99% chance. It only asks whether the votes left could close the gap.

Constable Prec. 3

Constable Prec. 3: reported votes and shares
Candidate	Votes	Share
Drummond, Jon R	4,080	97.9%
Write-in: Unofficial	83	2.0%
Write-in: Unassigned	4	0.1%

4,167 valid selections. 5 of 5 precincts reporting.

Drummond, Jon ahead by 3,997 votes (95.9 points).

Estimate: Drummond, Jon >99% chance. It only asks whether the votes left could close the gap.

Constable Prec. 4

Constable Prec. 4: reported votes and shares
Candidate	Votes	Share
Write-in: Unofficial	305	97.8%
Write-in: Unassigned	7	2.2%

312 valid selections. 5 of 5 precincts reporting.

Write-in: Unofficial ahead by 298 votes (95.5 points).

Estimate: Write-in: Unofficial >99% chance. It only asks whether the votes left could close the gap.

Constable Prec. 5

Constable Prec. 5: reported votes and shares
Candidate	Votes	Share
Wirthlin, Melissa R	17,859	97.7%
Write-in: Unofficial	389	2.1%
Write-in: Unassigned	26	0.1%

18,274 valid selections. 23 of 23 precincts reporting.

Wirthlin, Melissa ahead by 17,470 votes (95.6 points).

Estimate: Wirthlin, Melissa >99% chance. It only asks whether the votes left could close the gap.

Constable Prec. 6

Constable Prec. 6: reported votes and shares
Candidate	Votes	Share
Write-in: Unofficial	23	100.0%
Write-in: Not Assigned	0	0.0%

23 valid selections. 2 of 2 precincts reporting.

Write-in: Unofficial ahead by 23 votes (100.0 points).

County Recorder

County Recorder: reported votes and shares
Candidate	Votes	Share
Cloud, Billy R	31,226	97.1%
Write-in: Unofficial	864	2.7%
Write-in: Unassigned	56	0.2%

32,146 valid selections. 55 of 55 precincts reporting.

Cloud, Billy ahead by 30,362 votes (94.5 points).

Estimate: Cloud, Billy >99% chance. It only asks whether the votes left could close the gap.

Palominas ESD49 10% M&O Budget Override

Palominas ESD49 10% M&O Budget Override: reported votes and shares
Candidate	Votes	Share
No	2,449	53.3%
Yes	2,143	46.7%

4,592 valid selections. 9 of 9 precincts reporting.

No ahead by 306 votes (6.7 points).

Estimate: No 97% chance. It only asks whether the votes left could close the gap.

St. David USD21 10% M&O Budget Override

St. David USD21 10% M&O Budget Override: reported votes and shares
Candidate	Votes	Share
No	900	56.4%
Yes	696	43.6%

1,596 valid selections. 5 of 5 precincts reporting.

No ahead by 204 votes (12.8 points).

Estimate: No >99% chance. It only asks whether the votes left could close the gap.

Cities & towns

City of Sierra Vista Council Member vote for 4

City of Sierra Vista Council Member: reported votes and shares
Candidate	Votes	Share
Wozniak, Edward	8,873	40.6%
Miers, Brian	8,736	40.0%
Write-in: Hewitt, Wesley	1,129	5.2%
Write-in: Holston, Chris	975	4.5%
Write-in: Kouza, Marvin	936	4.3%
Write-in: Unofficial	771	3.5%
Write-in: Cummings, Limor	230	1.1%
Write-in: Unassigned	185	0.8%

21,835 valid selections. 17 of 17 precincts reporting.

39 votes between the current last seat position and the next candidate.

Estimate: Wozniak, Edward, Miers, Brian, Write-in: Hewitt, Wesley and Write-in: Holston, Chris 52% chance for the last seat. It only asks whether the votes left could close the gap.

City of Sierra Vista Mayor

City of Sierra Vista Mayor: reported votes and shares
Candidate	Votes	Share
Flowers, Carolyn R.	5,320	39.9%
Rodriguez, Mark	4,537	34.1%
Martin, Brandon	3,420	25.7%
Write-in: Unofficial	41	0.3%
Write-in: Unassigned	3	0.0%

13,321 valid selections. 17 of 17 precincts reporting.

Flowers, Carolyn R. ahead by 783 votes (5.9 points).

Estimate: Flowers, Carolyn R. 96% chance. It only asks whether the votes left could close the gap.

City of Tombstone Council Member W4

City of Tombstone Council Member W4: reported votes and shares
Candidate	Votes	Share
Newbauer, James "Lefty"	148	51.6%
Burns, Jenn	132	46.0%
Write-in: Unofficial	7	2.4%
Write-in: Unassigned	0	0.0%

287 valid selections. 1 of 1 precincts reporting.

Newbauer, James "Lefty" ahead by 16 votes (5.6 points).

Estimate: Newbauer, James "Lefty" 95% chance. It only asks whether the votes left could close the gap.

Town of Huachuca City Council Member vote for 3

Town of Huachuca City Council Member: reported votes and shares
Candidate	Votes	Share
Trate, Debra	362	90.7%
Write-in: Unofficial	37	9.3%
Write-in: Unassigned	0	0.0%

399 valid selections. 1 of 1 precincts reporting.

Reported candidate selections; no local race call or seat outcome is inferred.

Town of Huachuca City Mayor

Town of Huachuca City Mayor: reported votes and shares
Candidate	Votes	Share
Hirshberg, Christy	263	65.4%
Settlemeyer, Keith	137	34.1%
Write-in: Unofficial	2	0.5%
Write-in: Unassigned	0	0.0%

402 valid selections. 1 of 1 precincts reporting.

Hirshberg, Christy ahead by 126 votes (31.3 points).

Estimate: Hirshberg, Christy >99% chance. It only asks whether the votes left could close the gap.

Schools

Bisbee USD No.2 10% M&O Budget Override

Bisbee USD No.2 10% M&O Budget Override: reported votes and shares
Candidate	Votes	Share
Yes	1,747	67.2%
No	854	32.8%

2,601 valid selections. 5 of 5 precincts reporting.

Yes ahead by 893 votes (34.3 points).

Estimate: Yes >99% chance. It only asks whether the votes left could close the gap.

Board Member San Simon USD 18 vote for 2

Board Member San Simon USD 18: reported votes and shares
Candidate	Votes	Share
Grill, Peter	271	57.4%
Norris, Skyler	155	32.8%
Sparkman, Mary	45	9.5%
Write-in: Unofficial	1	0.2%
Write-in: Unassigned	0	0.0%

472 valid selections. 2 of 2 precincts reporting.

110 votes between the current last seat position and the next candidate.

Estimate: Grill, Peter and Norris, Skyler >99% chance for the last seat. It only asks whether the votes left could close the gap.

Cities & towns

Largest first, using dated population estimates. Population describes the whole municipality and is not used to allocate votes. A place spanning counties has one canonical page linked from each containing county.

Sierra Vista44,907 · 2025 estimate
Douglas16,038 · 2025 estimate
Benson5,532 · 2025 estimate
Bisbee4,860 · 2025 estimate
Willcox3,189 · 2025 estimate
Huachuca City1,583 · 2025 estimate
Tombstone1,376 · 2025 estimate

Presidential voting history

Final county returns from 2000–2024. Different offices and electorates make this context for 2026, not a like-for-like estimate of the current election's final result.

Year	Democratic votes	Republican votes	All votes	Margin
2000	13,360	18,180	33,241	R +14.5
2004	17,514	26,556	44,483	R +20.3
2008	18,943	29,026	48,820	R +20.7
2012	18,546	29,497	49,003	R +22.3
2016	17,450	28,092	50,015	R +21.3
2020	23,732	35,556	60,442	R +19.6
2024	22,299	35,953	58,950	R +23.2

Margin is Democratic minus Republican share of all valid votes. Historical returns are final; current returns remain unofficial. MIT Election Data and Science Lab (CC0 (MEDSL)); Polling Forecast; original VEST (CC BY 4.0 (VEST / Polling Forecast)); Polling Forecast; original MEDSL (CC0 (MEDSL); CC BY 4.0 (Polling Forecast redistribution)).

Sources & scope

Reported contest data: Cochise County official results file.
Cochise County election office for local ballot information, official returns and address-specific resources.
Population: U.S. Census Bureau, July 1, 2025 estimates. Counts are for residents, not registered voters or ballots.
Election rules and reporting limits: our methodology. Judicial background: Arizona judicial performance review.

We do not infer local winners, certification, turnout, remaining ballots or citywide or districtwide results from precinct percentages, population, county totals or the number of seats. Your own ballot depends on your registered address.